If you loved Maximum Risk, try City on Fire
A bridge between a film you've already seen and one most people haven't. City on Fire has roughly 3.2× fewer votes than Maximum Risk — it's a deeper cut, not a mainstream recommendation. Here's what they share, and what the second one does that the first one doesn't.
What they share
Both films are directed by Ringo Lam Ling-Tung, and they both carry the raw mood tag, and they sit in Action / Crime / Thriller territory. If that's the register that drew you to Maximum Risk, the second film will land in a comparable space — through a different lens.
What City on Fire is
A neon string of fireworks bursts over Kowloon’s wet pavement. A revolver’s click echoes in a noodle shop back-alley. Ko Chow juggles three lies: one badge hidden behind clenched teeth, another ring in his pocket, and a badge that isn’t his hunting him down the same rain-slicked lane. The closer — a 1987 Hong Kong thriller that burns through loyalties faster than its own gunpowder fumes.
Ask 
ChatGPT
Claude
Grok
Le Chat
Perplexity
for a deeper bridge
ChatGPTClaudeGrokLe ChatPerplexity